###
Some geometric fun with the 1, 2 and sq rt of 5 triangle

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

I hope this is a little clearer.

The question mark is on the page because I do not have the mathematical
proof of those measurements. They are scaled and surmised from logic.

It may be that is will show that it is exactly in the ratio of 7 to 5.5.

Regardless it is a pretty solid diagram to show how one __could have designed__ The Great Pyramid with simply a marker, straightedge and compass.

It all starts with this image found on this website: http://goldennumber.net/phiformulageometry.htm

Cheers and of course solution to follow and when I post it you will
never look at The Great Pyramid in the same light again. It is I think,
as close as I will ever come, short of finding the work book of the
builder, in proving the mathematical design of this pyramid.

I will, I hope, show that rather than 440 cubits being the designed base
unit, the base of 440 cubits was only a by-product of the designed
height which itself was simply a by product of the simple 1, 2, and
square root of 5 triangle found everywhere at Giza and most importantly
in The King's Chamber itself.

I hope this is a little clearer.

The question mark is on the page because I do not have the mathematical
proof of those measurements. They are scaled and surmised from logic.

It may be that is will show that it is exactly in the ratio of 7 to 5.5.

Regardless it is a pretty solid diagram to show how one __could have designed__ The Great Pyramid with simply a marker, straightedge and compass.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment