Thursday, October 2, 2014

Noah's Great Rainbow

Noah's Great Rainbow

Searching for answers in the sacred writings of the past

I doubt if there is anyone educated and living on our planet who has not heard the story of Gilgamesh or the story of Noah and his ark and his saving mankind and all the animals from "The Flood". For those few who have not allow me to post just a bit of it from "The Bible".

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 And it repented the Lord that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7 And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.
8 But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord.
9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
10 And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.
12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.
13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.
14 Make thee an ark of gopher wood; rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch.

To make a long story short the "Lord" then sends the rains that continue for 40 days and 40 nights until all The Earth is covered and all the wicked are destroyed. Then this happens:

13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry.
14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.
15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,
16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.

So finally The Earth is dry and man sets foot on it again but then "The Covenant" is made and that is the basis of this website. Here is the covenant made by "The Lord" (The Creator) to Man:

8 And God spake unto Noah, and to his sons with him, saying,
9 And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed after you;
10 And with every living creature that is with you, of the fowl, of the cattle, and of every beast of the earth with you; from all that go out of the ark, to every beast of the earth.
11 And I will establish my covenant with you, neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.
12 And God said, This is the token of the covenant which I make between me and you and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations:
13 I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth.
14 And it shall come to pass, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be seen in the cloud:
15 And I will remember my covenant, which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and the waters shall no more become a flood to destroy all flesh.
16 And the bow shall be in the cloud; and I will look upon it, that I may remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth.
17 And God said unto Noah, This is the token of the covenant, which I have established between me and all flesh that is upon the earth.

Before we move too deeply into this "myth" or "legend" let's again take a look at this verse:

13 And it came to pass in the six hundredth and first year, in the first month, the first day of the month, the waters were dried up from off the earth: and Noah removed the covering of the ark, and looked, and, behold, the face of the ground was dry

It seems apparent, at least it did to Clive Ross, that all the numbers in the Bible were symbolic and were really referring to something else other than what it appeared so following that lead in those days there were 30 days in a month and 12 months to a year and so 600 years (it is 600 because it is the very first day of the 601st year that the waters have receded) = 600 x 12 x 30 and it yields 216000 a number that is immediately recognizable to the number crunchers on the board.

This is taken from a new website I am working on where hopefully I will show that the story of Noah and The Ark and "The "Bow" Covenant were all symbolic for something else.

The website: Noah's Great Rainbow 

 There are a couple of theories I am going to examine as we get on. One will be that the Genesis account of The Biblical story of Noah and The Ark suggests that it is actually, and may depict, a journey of a spacecraft entering our solar system. (Clive Ross) and secondly that symbolically Noah may be mankind, The Ark The Earth and finally that the various bands of the asteroid belts are in fact exactly mimicking the light spectrum of our limited eyesight.

I hope you enjoy and any comments will be greatly appreciated.

 Okay firstly I am going to examine my own theory that the asteroid belt is exactly as it is supposed to be, exactly where it is supposed to be and that it could not have been any other way and that there is a very logical reason for thinking it might be Noah's Great rainbow. But first a word from Zechariah Sitchin. Sitchin was the first (as far as I can remember) who suggested that the biblical and Sumerian tale of the creation might in fact be a true account of the history of our world and that the asteroid belt was "the hammered out bracelet" as described in both Genesis and The Sumerian [Enuma elish (“When in the heights”), taken from its opening words.] As a further clarification of this we might use these words again taken from Genesis but always also in a much older Sumerian of Akkadian text and we have this: (note please read this page for an alleged version of the original Sumerian text)

 Genesis picks up the primordial tale here and describes the forming of the asteroid belt thus:

And Elohim said:

Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters and let it divide the waters from the waters. And Elohim made the Firmament, dividing the waters which are under the Firmament from the waters which are above the Firmament. And Elohim called the Firmament “Heaven.”

Realizing that the Hebrew word Shama’im is used to speak of Heaven or the heavens in general, the editors of Genesis went into some length to use two terms for “the Heaven” created as a result of the destruction of Tiamat. What separated the “upper waters” from the “lower waters.” the Genesis text stresses, was the Raki’a; generally translated “Firmament,” it literally means “Hammered-out Bracelet.”

It is my contention along with Sitchin and a few others that the waters that we being divided were a once watery Venus, a watery Earth and an also once watery Mars. Here is what this page has to day about that:

Data from two unmanned spacecraft that probed Venus for an extended period after December 1978, Pioneer-Venus I and 2, convinced the team of scientists that analyzed the findings that Venus “may once have been covered by water at an average depth of thirty feet”; Venus, they concluded (Science, May 7, 1982), once had “at least 100 times as much water in liquid form as it does today in the form of vapor.”

Subsequent studies have suggested that some of that ancient water was used up in the formation of the sulphuric acid clouds, while some of it gave up its oxygen to oxidize the rocky surface of the planet.

“The lost oceans of Venus” can be traced in its rocks; that was the conclusion of a joint report of U.S. and Soviet scientists
published in the May 1986 issue of Science. There was indeed water “below the Firmament,” not only on Earth but also on Venus.

The latest scientific discoveries have added Mars to the list of inner planets whose waters corroborate the ancient statement. At the end of the nineteenth century the existence of enigmatic “canals” on Mars was popularized by the telescopic observations of the Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli and the American Percival Lowell. This was generally laughed off; and the conviction prevailed that Mars was dry and barren. The first unmanned surveys of Mars, in the 1960s, seemed to confirm the notion that it was a “geologically lifeless planet, like the Moon.”

This notion was completely discredited when the spacecraft Mariner 9 launched in 1971, went into orbit around Mars and photographed its entire surface, not just the 10 percent or so surveyed by all the previous probes. The results, in the words of the astronomers managing the project, “were astounding.” Mariner 9 revealed that volcanoes, canyons, and dry river beds abound on Mars

So it is quite possible that "in the beginning" there was water on the inner planets and it is I think common knowledge that many of the moons of Saturn and Jupiter have ice and thus possibly watery moons and I think we all know that Uranus and Neptune are thought to be water giants.

Uranus: The ice mantle is not in fact composed of ice in the conventional sense, but of a hot and dense fluid consisting of water, ammonia and other volatiles.[11][58] This fluid, which has a high electrical conductivity, is sometimes called a water–ammonia ocean.[59]

Neptune: The mantle is equivalent to 10 to 15 Earth masses and is rich in water, ammonia and methane.[1] As is customary in planetary science, this mixture is referred to as icy even though it is a hot, highly dense fluid. This fluid, which has a high electrical conductivity, is sometimes called a water–ammonia ocean.[44] The mantle may consist of a layer of ionic water where the water molecules break down into a soup of hydrogen and oxygen ions, and deeper down superionic water in which the oxygen crystallises but the hydrogen ions float around freely within the oxygen lattice.[45] At a depth of 7000 km, the conditions may be such that methane decomposes into diamond crystals that rain downwards like hailstones.[46] Very-high-pressure experiments at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory suggest that the base of the mantle may comprise an ocean of liquid diamond, with floating solid 'diamond-bergs'.

Okay so it appears that in the very early chapters of Genesis and The Creation Story we have "The Creator creating the asteroid belt but it is a possibility that the this in fact is not quite true and that "the firmament was simply the corridor or space where it could be placed in the future but regardless for now let's fast forward to Bible Date: [b][u]Calculated BC date for the Flood: 2348 BC[/u][/b] Now surely you all must see the obviousness of the closeness with this date and the supposed date of the construction of The Great Pyramid. they are almost identical. Is there a clue here somewhere ?

What we are going to do now is assume that there was indeed a world wide flood of cataclysmic proportion and that the entire Earth was flooded to a depth of, well if we are going to cover Mt. Everest it is going to have to be 29,000 feet above the present sea level. That is a very large volume of water and works out very roughly precipitation equaling 1 inch every 9.93 sections if we assumed it rained for 40 days and 40 nights. (40 x 24 x 60 x 60 = 3456000 seconds and covering 29,000 x 12 = 348,000 inches)

Now I will have to think that the water that was presently on The Earth could not have turned into water vapor and returned to The Earth as rain so I would guess that the "water" came from outside in the form of comets or other water carrying bodies I would further wonder why nothing seemed to protect our planet from this barrage. But for whatever reason our ancient legends are ripe with the story of this inundation and it's aftermath of which the most colorful is probably Noah's ark.

The Bible is a very complicated piece of literature for it is always very important to try to reason whether it is being literal or being symbolic. In the case of Noah and his ark I would suspect it is being symbolic ... but for what ? Well before I move on does anyone want to weight in with their ideas ?

Hi all as we progress you will see how I came to the realizations I did, In order to understand what Noah's Rainbow was and is I should think we must go back to basics and study exactly what a rainbow is. Light has an unusual property and that is it always goes at the same speed in a given medium. for example in a total vacuum it would travel at the same speed all the time regardless of the color of the light. So this means that red light travels at the same speed as blue light and so on but how can that be ? Well to get to the explanation one has to but memorize a very simply solution. The frequency of light times it's wavelength will always, I repeat always equal 299,792,458 meters. As an example red has a wavelength of between approximately 700 and 635 nm (nanometers) or about on average 650 nm so it's frequency interval measure in Terra hertz (THZ) or thousand of cycles is equal to 299792458 divided by 650,000 and we find that we get a value of 461.22 THZ. Now as interesting as that is we find, and this is really a key observation I made, is that in the light spectrum, that very tiny band of visible electromagnetic radiation that our eyes perceive as something and allows us "to see" has an almost magical quality to it. And this is the fact that the maximum wavelength multiplied by the minimum frequency is virtually identical to the maximum frequency multiplied by the minimum wavelength and the values all lie between approximately 750 and 430 and so the rainbow can run in either direction as shown in the chart I made below.


And as an example 750 nm x 400 THZ = approx speed of light of 300,000,000 meters (exact would be 750 x 399.723277333333...)

And it is my contention that Noah's Great Rainbow does the same thing.

In the traditional color wheel used by painters, violet and purple are both placed between red and blue. Purple occupies the space closer to red, between crimson and violet. Violet is closer to blue, and is usually less intense and bright than purple.

While the two colors look similar, from the point of view of optics there are important differences. Violet is a spectral, or real color – it occupies its own place at the end of the spectrum of light, and it has its own wavelength (approximately 380–420 nm). It was one of the colors of the spectrum first identified by Isaac Newton in 1672, whereas purple is simply a combination of two colors, red and blue. There is no such thing as the "wavelength of purple light"; it only exists as a combination.

Monochromatic violet light cannot be produced by the Red-Green-Blue (RGB) color system, the method used to create colors on a television screen or computer display (a fact that is, indeed, true of any monochromatic color of the spectrum besides the shades of red, green, and blue chosen for the primaries). However, the system is capable of approximating it due to the fact that the L-cone (red cone) in the eye is uniquely sensitive to two different discontinuous regions in the visible spectrum – its primary region being the long wavelength light of the yellow-red region of the spectrum, and a secondary smaller region overlapping with the S-cone (blue cone) in the shortest wavelength, violet part. This means that when violet light strikes the eye, the S-cone should be stimulated strongly, and the L-cone stimulated weakly along with it. By lighting the red primary of the display weakly along with the blue primary, a relatively similar pattern of sensitization can be achieved, creating an illusion, the sensation of extremely short wavelength light using what is in fact mixed light of two longer wavelengths. The resulting color has the same hue as pure violet, however, it has a lower saturation.

Updated color chart:[/img]

 After noticing the curious fact that lower end of visible light (red) in nanometers x's highest end of visible light in violet gives us speed of light and that the rainbow could go either way when one used the absolute values derived in the tables I then noticed quite to my surprise and amazement that the numbers we were dealing with here in nanometers and frequency were the precise same measurements of a certain celestial object, namely the asteroid belt however in a scale ONE TRILLION TIMES LARGER ! It was quite a revelation. It was I think the clearest example that I have found for the old expression ... As Above ... So Below.

I am presently working on a color correct chart that will visibly show and express this theory. However as a first step let us use Jupiter. The semi major axis of Jupiter is 778,570,200 kilometers and if we divide by 1 TRILLION we get 778.57 nanometers and this is at the edge of the visible spectrum in violet if we use wavelength and at the lowest reaches of red toward infra red if we use frequency.

It is brilliant in it's simplicity and I guess shows us a couple of things, maybe. This could show conclusively that all rules apply to both the macro and the micro and secondly that the asteroid belt falling precisely within the visible spectrum but at a scale ONE TRILLION TIMES LARGER could in fact be the rainbow created for Noah and as a covenant to him from "The Creator".

The prospect is tantalizing and once I get my final chart done it will be perfectly obvious and clear. But in the meantime think about it. Here we have a species (Mankind) that has a very limited range of abilities and can only see within the electromagnetic spectrum from 400 to 800 nanometers and by a simple quirk of nature and random event the "hammered out bracelet" of Sitchin turns out to be at the exact same place in relation to the Sun (Ra and the Egyptian deity) but in a scale precisely 1,000,000,000,000 (ONE TRILLION TIMES LARGER) than the rainbow and the light spectrum.

To me it has to be the work of "The Creator"

Here is the chart from the old website of mine where I first introduced this theory. I am presently expanding and fine tuning it and color coding it exactly but in the meantime this will do I am sure.


Just a very quick side trip for now.

Uranus and this information:

Physical characteristics of Uranus

Mean radius 25362±7 km[8](b)

Equatorial radius 25559±4 km 4.007 Earths[8](b)

Polar radius 24973±20 km 3.929 Earths[8](b)

[8] Seidelmann, P. Kenneth; Archinal, Brent A.; A'Hearn, Michael F. et al. (2007). "Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on cartographic coordinates and rotational elements: 2006". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 98 (3): 155–180.

(b) Refers to the level of 1 bar atmospheric pressure. [/quote]

Speed of light 299792.458 kilometers per second

Astronomical Unit = 149,597,871

Speed of light
-------------- x 1000 = 2.0039888

2.0039888 x 2 = [b][u]4.007977600[/u][/b]

Equatorial radius of The Earth is [b][u]6378.14 kilometers[/u][/b](7)(8)

(7) "Selected Astronomical Constants, 2011". The Astronomical Almanac. Retrieved 2011-02-25.

(8) World Geodetic System (WGS-84). Available online from National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

4.007977600 x 12756.28 kilometers = 51126.88

Diameter of Uranus is 2 x 25559 ±4 km = 2 x 25555 to 25563 = 51110 to 51126 or an exact match.


Equatorial diameter of Uranus in kilometers = (speed of light x 1000 / value of an astronomical unit ) x 2 and then times equatorial diameter of our Earth.

Margin of error .... NONE !


  1. fascinating. Most of the calculations shot over my head, but the use of rainbows had me grinning. My books are about rainbows.

    There could be a significance to the number 7 as well. Seven powers/planets/races/leaders...? not sure

  2. Thanks Michele and now it appears that The Kuiper Belt between Neptune and 52 AU (astronomical units or about 7,779,089,276.4 kilometers from our Sun or about 10 times further than Jupiter works as well. I will add that page when I have time.